Caleigh and Candice end the “chicken vs. fish” debate, once and for all. - KCRW
Caleigh and Candice end the “chicken vs. fish” debate, once and for all.
Caleigh and Candice break down one of your daily decisions with the biggest planetary impact: what you eat. Which is better for the planet, being pescetarian or eating chicken every once in a while? And what about eating a little lower on the food chain?
Which is better, chicken or fish?
Credits
Guest:
- Dana Hunnes- Senior clinical dietitian; adjunct professor, UCLA
Hosts:
Caleigh Wells,
Candice Dickens-Russell
Related Knowledge Center: ENERGY BASICS: nuclear
Nuclear energy provides almost 20 percent of the U.S. electricity supply. Advocates have called for an expanded role for nuclear as an emissions-free fuel source. But the economics of building new reactors are daunting. In addition, lingering safety concerns are an institutionalized part of the calculation of nuclear regulation, and highly radioactive nuclear waste remains a can that public officials have been inclined to kick down the road. The Energy Information Administration projects a sharp decline in nuclear power generation over the next decade, as new nuclear plants — two are planned — are more than offset by anticipated retirements of several operating reactors.