Australia Says Coal to Nuclear Switch Would Cost $249 Billion - Yahoo Finance
Australia Says Coal to Nuclear Switch Would Cost $249 Billion
(Bloomberg) -- Replacing Australia’s coal-fired power stations with small modular nuclear power reactors would cost A$387 billion ($249 billion), according to Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen.
Most Read from Bloomberg
How Auto Executives Misread the UAW Ahead of Historic Strike
Xi’s Missing Defense Chief Opens Door for US Military Talks
Europe Is Better Prepared If Trump Wins Again, Germany’s Baerbock Says
MGM Resorts Hackers Broke In After Tricking IT Service Desk
The high cost makes such a transition, advocated by the country’s opposition, a “unicorn and a fantasy,” Bowen said on ABC Radio National Monday.
Australia would need 71 small modular reactors to replace the 21 gigawatts of coal-fired power in the system, he said, discussing analysis from the Climate Change Department. “I can’t think of a worse fit for Australia than nuclear power,” Bowen said.
Read more: Can Small Nuclear Reactors Really Help The Climate?: QuickTake
Backers of small modular reactors include Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, though there’s currently only a handful of operating plants and key developers have recently flagged cost challenges.
Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek
MBAs Are Spurning McKinsey to Buy Small Companies
The Real-Life Inspiration Behind The Bonfire of the Vanities
An Online Startup Pitches a New Kind of MBA
How Sam Bankman-Fried’s Elite Parents Enabled His Crypto Empire
TikTok Shop Is a Real E-Commerce Threat
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.
Related Knowledge Center: Carbon capture
The federal government is investing heavily in the development of carbon capture and storage (or sequestration), which offers the enticing prospect of preventing carbon dioxide emissions produced during combustion from entering the atmosphere and contributing to climate change. But the technologies involved, while proven, remain expensive, an obstacle to widespread adoption.