News

Anna Gomez’s Lonely Fight

Columbia Journalism Review · Liam Scott · last updated

On a recent evening, Anna Gomez, the lone Democrat on the Federal Communications Commission, sat before fifty or so people in a government building outside Washington, DC. It was the latest stop on what she’d been calling her First Amendment tour. “It is foundational to our democracy,” she said. “And yet, today, the greatest threat to that freedom is coming from our own government.”

Gomez—who is fifty-eight, and a lawyer born in Orlando, who spent her childhood in Bogotá, Colombia, and New Jersey—has been touring since April, and found a spotlight late last week, when the FCC announced its approval of a merger between Paramount, which controls CBS, and Skydance, a production company. At the FCC, which regulates public radio and television airwaves, most of the decision-making power lies with its chairman, Brendan Carr, whom President Donald Trump put in that role in January. Under Carr’s watch, the FCC has reopened previously closed complaints against ABC News, for its moderation of the presidential debate between Trump and Kamala Harris, and NBC, over whether Harris’s appearance on Saturday Night Live violated a legal requirement to offer equal time to both candidates. Carr launched investigations into whether NPR and PBS inappropriately accepted advertisements. And he’s paid special attention to CBS News—accusing it of, among other things, unfairly editing a 60 Minutes interview with Harris. (In early July, Paramount agreed to pay sixteen million dollars to settle a separate lawsuit filed by Trump over the interview.)

Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics

State of Play

News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.

The White House vs. the press


More informationabout Democracy and politics

Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press

State of Play

Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.

Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America


More informationabout The White House vs. the press

Related Knowledge Center: Information integrity

State of Play

In an increasingly fractured media landscape, truth has been a casualty in the public discussion. Coverage has been warped by the business needs of struggling news organizations, and a significant segment of the public relies on bad-faith outlets that are little more than propagandists. While fact-checking has become routine, some organizations are exploring other ways to combat the trends. And misinformation spewed by AI-driven chatbots has become more of a feature than simply a bug. 

Fact-checking and its detractors


More informationabout Information integrity