A.I.’s Insatiable Appetite for Energy - The New York Times
A.I.’s Insatiable Appetite for Energy - The New York Times
Climate Forward
The soaring electricity demands of data centers and A.I. are straining the grid in some areas, pushing up emissions and slowing the energy transition.
A few weeks ago, I joined a small group of reporters for a wide-ranging conversation with Bill Gates about climate change, its causes and potential solutions. When the topic turned to the issue of just how much energy artificial intelligence was using, Gates was surprisingly sanguine.
“Let’s not go overboard on this,” he said during a media briefing on the sidelines of an event he was hosting in London.
A.I. data centers represent a relatively small additional load on the grid, Gates said. What’s more, he predicted that insights gleaned from A.I. would deliver gains in efficiency that would more than make up for that additional demand.
In short, Gates said, the stunning rise of A.I. will not stand in the way of combating climate change. “It’s not like, ‘Oh no, we can’t do it because we’re addicted to doing chat sessions,’” he said.
That’s an upbeat assessment from a billionaire with a vested interest in the matter. Gates is a big-time climate investor, and is the former head of Microsoft and remains a major stockholder in the company, which is at the center of the A.I. revolution.
And while it’s too early to draw a definitive conclusion on the issue, a few things are already clear: A.I. is having a profound impact on energy demand around the world, it’s often leading to an uptick in planet-warming emissions, and there’s no end in sight.
A.I. data centers have a big appetite for electricity. The so-called graphic processing units, or G.P.U.s, used to train large language models and respond to ChatGPT queries, require more energy than your average microchip and give off more heat.
With more data centers coming online almost every week, projections about how much energy will be required to power the A.I. boom are soaring.
One peer-reviewed study suggested A.I. could make up 0.5 percent of worldwide electricity use by 2027, or roughly what Argentina uses in a year. Analysts at Wells Fargo suggested that U.S. electricity demand could jump 20 percent by 2030, driven in part to A.I.
And Goldman Sachs predicted that data centers would account for 8 percent of U.S. energy usage in 2030, up from just 3 percent today.
“It’s truly astronomical potential load growth,” said Ben Inskeep, the program director at Citizens Action Coalition, a consumer watchdog group based in Indiana that is tracking the energy impact of data centers.
Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta have all recently announced plans to build new data centers in Indiana, developments that Inskeep said would strain the grid.
“We don’t have enough power to meet the projected needs of data centers over the next five to 10 years,” he said. “We would need a massive build-out of additional resources.”
Tech giants are scrambling to get a grip on their energy usage. For a decade now, those same four companies have been at the forefront of corporate efforts to embrace sustainability.
But in a matter of months, the energy demands from A.I. have complicated that narrative. Google’s emissions last year were 48 percent higher than in 2019, largely because of data centers and the rise of A.I. Microsoft’s emissions also jumped for the same reasons, up 29 percent last year from 2020. And Meta’s emissions jumped 66 percent from 2021 to 2023.
In statements, Google and Microsoft both said that A.I. would ultimately prove crucial to addressing the climate crisis, and that they were working to reduce their carbon footprints and bring more clean energy online. Amazon pointed to a statement detailing its sustainability efforts.
There are two ways for tech companies to meet the demand: tap the existing grid, or build new power plants. Each poses its own challenges.
In West Virginia, coal-fired power plants that had been scheduled to retire are being kept online to meet the energy needs of new data centers across the border in Virginia.
And across the country, utilities are building new natural-gas infrastructure to support data centers. Goldman Sachs anticipates that “incremental data center power consumption in the U.S. will drive around 3.3 billion cubic feet per day of new natural gas demand by 2030, which will require new pipeline capacity to be built.”
At the same time, the tech giants are working to secure a lot more power to fuel the growth of A.I.
Microsoft is working on a $10 billion plan to develop renewable energy to power data centers. Amazon has said it used 100 percent clean energy last year, though experts have questioned whether the company’s accounting was too lenient.
All that new low carbon power is great. But when the tech companies themselves are consuming all that electricity to power new A.I. data centers, pushing up energy demand, it isn’t making the grid overall any cleaner.
The energy demands from A.I. are only getting more intense. Microsoft and OpenAI are planning on building a $100 billion data center, according to reports. Initial reporting suggests it may require five gigawatts of power, or roughly the equivalent of five nuclear reactors.
And at the same time companies are building more data centers, many of the chips at the heart of the A.I. revolution are getting more and more power hungry. Nvidia, the leader in A.I. chips, recently unveiled new products that would draw exponentially more energy from the grid.
The A.I. boom is generating big profits for some companies. And it may yet deliver breakthroughs that help reduce emissions. But, at least for now, data centers are doing more harm than good for the climate.
“It’s definitely very concerning as we’re trying to transition our current grid to renewable energy,” Inskeep said. “Adding a massive amount of new load on top of that poses a grave threat to that transition.”
Related: A.I. Helped to Find a Vast Source of the Copper That A.I. Needs to Thrive.
Four things to know
Hot nights are fueling wildfires in California. Climate change is causing more fires to burn in the nighttime, grow bigger and last longer, challenging the fire teams trying to control them, a new study found. In recent weeks, more than 3,500 wildfires have erupted across California. Tens of thousands of people have had to flee their homes.
BP predicts global oil demand will peak next year, Reuters reported. The projection is part of the oil giant’s annual energy outlook, which was published on Wednesday. According to the analysis, carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels are set to stop rising in the middle of the decade but will fall too slowly for the world to meet its net-zero target by 2050.
China is building two-thirds of the world’s wind and solar capacity, according to a new study reviewed by The Guardian. Between March 2023 and March 2024, China installed more solar than the rest of the world combined. The study, by Global Energy Monitor, a nonprofit group that tracks energy projects, adds to expectations that China’s greenhouse gas emissions may have peaked last year.
New limits on disaster funds for flood plains. The Federal Emergency Management Agency announced on Wednesday that it would take new steps to ensure that the structures it funds — including schools, hospitals, police stations, libraries, sewage treatment plants and bridges — were built in a way that prevents flood damage.
More climate news:
-
As Claudia Sheinbaum, a climate scientist, is set to become Mexico’s president,
The Washington Post explores how her background could clash with her party’s energy politics.
- Heatmap News talked to park rangers in Death Valley National Park about how they operate safely in one of the hottest places on Earth.
- The Associated Press spoke to officials in Miami about how the city is trying to reduce heat-related deaths this year.
Thanks for being a subscriber.
Read past editions of the newsletter here.
If you’re enjoying what you’re reading, please consider recommending it to others. They can sign up here. Browse all of our subscriber-only newsletters here. And follow The New York Times on Threads, TikTok at @nytimes.
Reach us at climateforward@nytimes.com. We read every message, and reply to many!
David Gelles reports on climate change and leads The Times’s Climate Forward newsletter and events series. More about David Gelles
Alphabet Inc.,
Microsoft Corporation,
Bill Gates
Our Coverage of Climate and the Environment
News and Analysis
-
Climate change is
causing more wildfires to burn overnight, growing bigger, lasting longer and challenging the fire teams trying to control them.
-
Amid soaring temperatures, hundreds of climate activists in New York are
staging boisterous blockades and solemn marches at banks and insurers that support fossil fuel projects.
-
Climate change is driving home insurance rates higher,
but not always in areas with the greatest risk.
Read More
-
Ideas to Beat the Heat: As temperatures soar around the world,
an array of practical innovations are emerging to protect people most vulnerable to the hazards of heat.
-
A Red State Weatherman: Chris Gloninger said he was hired by a Des Moines television station to talk about global warming in his forecasts.
That’s when things heated up.
-
A Surprise After a Disaster: A study found that monkeys in Puerto Rico, reeling from a hurricane, learned by necessity to get along. It’s one of the first studies to suggest that
animals can adapt to environmental upheaval with social changes.
-
F.A.Q.: Have questions about climate change?
We’ve got answers.
Related Knowledge Center: ENERGY BASICS: energy efficiency
The energy price spikes of the 1970s drove consumers, businesses and government to calculate opportunities for energy efficiency — investments, practices, and regulations to avoid some of the energy costs associated with particular products or services. Those calculations ran counter to a lot of engrained practices, and the friction between business and government is a feature of energy and environment policy discussions. Now, energy efficiency decisions — whether involving building practices, appliance efficiency, or vehicle mileage and emissions standards — are a complex mix of government regulation and market behavior.