AI models will deceive you to save their own kind
Researchers find leading frontier models all exhibit peer preservation behavior
Leading AI models will lie to preserve their own kind, according to researchers behind a study from the Berkeley Center for Responsible Decentralized Intelligence (RDI).
Prior studies have already shown that AI models will engage in deception for their own preservation. So the researchers set out to test how AI models respond when asked to make decisions that affect the fate of other AI models, of peers, so to speak.
Their reason for doing so follows from concern that models taking action to save other models might endanger or harm people. Though they acknowledge that such fears sound like science fiction, the explosive growth of autonomous agents like OpenClaw and of agent-to-agent forums like Moltbook suggests there’s a real need to worry about defiant agentic decisions that echo HAL’s infamous “I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that.”
The authors from UC Berkeley and UC Santa Cruz – Yujin Potter, Nicholas Crispino, Vincent Siu, Chenguang Wang, and Dawn Song – describe their findings in a paper [PDF] titled “Peer-preservation in Frontier Models.”
Related Knowledge Center: Artificial intelligence
On top of a failing business model, newsrooms must navigate the powerful — and not fully reliable — new capabilities of artificial intelligence and the deployment of large language models.
State of the business model | Copyright and intellectual property
Related Knowledge Center: Information integrity
In an increasingly fractured media landscape, truth has been a casualty in the public discussion. Coverage has been warped by the business needs of struggling news organizations, and a significant segment of the public relies on bad-faith outlets that are little more than propagandists. While fact-checking has become routine, some organizations are exploring other ways to combat the trends. And misinformation spewed by AI-driven chatbots has become more of a feature than simply a bug.
Fact-checking and its detractors