An AI Company Wanted to Buy My Reporting Notes
A “data procurement worker” reached out. I was too curious to resist a meeting about their plans.
A LinkedIn message arrived with an unusual subject line: “Licensing newsroom archives—paid.” It was sent by a “data procurement worker” for a company called Handshake, which describes itself as a “job search platform.” The message read, “Hi Jules. Odd approach, but a real one. Handshake licenses genuine professional documents to test how well AI handles actual knowledge work.”
I wondered what such a request could possibly have to do with me, so I read on, and learned that Handshake was seeking “one story followed all the way through, rather than published articles alone.” The company would be happy to pay for documents related to journalism work, including “the pitch, reporting notes, interview transcripts, FOIA responses and source documents, the successive drafts, the editor’s markup, the published piece, and any correction that followed. That progression—draft to published to correction—is the single most useful thing a newsroom holds for us.”
Related Knowledge Center: Artificial intelligence
On top of a failing business model, newsrooms must navigate the powerful — and not fully reliable — new capabilities of artificial intelligence and the deployment of large language models.
State of the business model | Copyright and intellectual property
Related Knowledge Center: Inside the newsroom
As newsrooms struggle with rickety business models and precarious finances — as well as new technologies — they are deploying an array of editorial responses.
The Times and its critics | Washington Post mortem