51.3 Million Viewers Tuned In for Shaky Biden and Boisterous Trump
It was the smallest TV audience for a presidential debate since 2004, but CNN’s telecast was still among the highest-rated programs of the year. The numbers are in: 51.3 million Americans tuned in live to watch Thursday night’s televised debate between President Biden and former President Donald J. Trump. The prime-time bout, organized by CNN and simulcast on more than a dozen networks, was easily the most-viewed moment of the 2024 presidential campaign, the sort of mass civic gathering that is increasingly rare in a choose-your-own-news era of media. And the figure released on Friday by Nielsen, which mostly measures traditional TV sets, did not include the likely millions more who watched on digital news sites and social media platforms. The size of the TV audience — similar to that for an N.F.L. conference championship game — could be grim news for the Biden campaign, given the shaky and stumbling performance by the president, which set off panic in the upper echelons of the Democratic Party. But viewership was also down 30 percent from the first Biden-Trump debate in September 2020, which notched more than 73 million viewers. Nielsen said Thursday’s matchup in Atlanta was the lowest-rated general-election debate since the final meeting of George W. Bush and John Kerry in 2004. Part of the decline can be explained by timing: The Biden-Trump debate occurred far earlier in the year than usual, well before many casual voters have become focused on the election. Overall TV audiences are smaller in the summertime, too, and the number of households with active cable subscriptions has dropped precipitously since 2020. CNN, which hosted the debate (and supplied the moderators, Dana Bash and Jake Tapper), had the highest viewership of any network, although only just. About 9.5 million people watched live on CNN, compared with 9.3 million who watched on Fox News and 9.2 million on ABC. CNN was the clear winner among adults 25 to 54, the most important group for advertisers. In the 10 p.m. hour, which included a round of post-debate analysis, Fox News pulled ahead of CNN in total viewers. The TV audience for the debate skewed older; roughly two-thirds of viewers were over 55, Nielsen said. Those who tuned in to watch the candidates did not tune out: The live TV audience stayed roughly the same throughout the 99-minute telecast. For CNN, which has endured a rocky period of management changes and sagging ratings, the debate was a much-needed shot in the arm. The network has fallen far behind its rivals; before Thursday’s debate, it was on track to record its lowest-rated month in prime time since 1991. Whether another head-to-head presidential event occurs this year is an open question. The candidates have agreed to meet again on Sept. 10 for a debate sponsored by ABC. But Mr. Biden or Mr. Trump could choose to withdraw from that event depending on where the race stands after Labor Day. Michael M. Grynbaum writes about the intersection of media, politics and culture. He has been a media correspondent at The Times since 2016. More about Michael M. Grynbaum 2024 Elections, CNN Inside the Media Industry — CNN: The network is in charge of every aspect of the Biden-Trump debate, a major shift from previous years. — Netflix: The company’s latest internal memo about its corporate culture is more about how it expects employees to behave than what it wants to become. — The Washington Post: Robert Winnett, the editor selected to run the paper following Sally Buzbee’s resignation, will not take up that position, after reports raised questions about his ties to unethical news gathering practices in Britain. — Warner Bros. Discovery: The company’s TNT channel and the N.B.A. have long been inextricably linked, but that may end after next season. — HBO: The network has hit an unusually fallow stretch. Executives hope the return of “House of the Dragon” could be the start of a new winning streak.
Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics
News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.
Related Knowledge Center: Information integrity
In an increasingly fractured media landscape, truth has been a casualty in the public discussion. Coverage has been warped by the business needs of struggling news organizations, and a significant segment of the public relies on bad-faith outlets that are little more than propagandists. While fact-checking has become routine, some organizations are exploring other ways to combat the trends. And misinformation spewed by AI-driven chatbots has become more of a feature than simply a bug.
Fact-checking and its detractors