In 2020, FiveThirtyEight published a chart that was weaponized to spread election disinformation. It still haunts me.
The morning after Election Day in 2020, FiveThirtyEight — the now-defunct political data site, where I worked at the time as a politics writer — published a chart on our liveblog. Within hours, it was being circulated online as supposed proof of election fraud, detached from its context and used to fuel conspiracy theories. It has haunted me ever since.
The chart showed the vote totals over time for Wisconsin. At first glance, it appeared that Joe Biden was lagging far behind Donald Trump and then suddenly surged ahead to a tie. Almost immediately, people online seized on the image, claiming that all those Biden votes were actually evidence of fraud. In fact, it was nothing of the sort, and both Trump and Biden’s votes had increased — the result of a large batch of absentee and mail ballots being counted all at once.
“I remember panicking,” said Laura Bronner, who was FiveThirtyEight’s quantitative editor at the time and made the chart. (Bronner is now a senior applied scientist at the Public Policy Group and Immigration Policy Lab in Zurich.) “I remember having conversations about, ‘What do we do given that this is being misinterpreted?’”
Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics
News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.
Related Knowledge Center: Information integrity
In an increasingly fractured media landscape, truth has been a casualty in the public discussion. Coverage has been warped by the business needs of struggling news organizations, and a significant segment of the public relies on bad-faith outlets that are little more than propagandists. While fact-checking has become routine, some organizations are exploring other ways to combat the trends. And misinformation spewed by AI-driven chatbots has become more of a feature than simply a bug.
Fact-checking and its detractors